Artificial intelligence has quickly become one of the most discussed technologies in modern music production. Platforms such as Suno allow users to generate complete songs with only a few prompts and a relatively low subscription cost. However, as AI-generated music becomes more common, questions about sound quality, originality and artistic identity are becoming increasingly important.
According to the owner of Alveda Music, listeners are beginning to show signs of fatigue with fully AI-generated releases. The Greek electronic music label has therefore decided to stop releasing tracks created entirely by artificial intelligence, arguing that current AI systems still struggle to match the warmth, detail and authenticity of human-led productions.
The problem with production quality
AI can create impressive musical ideas. It may produce an attractive melody, a powerful chord progression or an energetic arrangement within seconds. For beginners, this can be an accessible way to experiment with songwriting and electronic music.
Nevertheless, composition is only one part of music production. A professional release also depends on sound selection, arrangement, mixing, mastering and artistic direction. These are areas in which fully AI-generated tracks can still sound limited.
The owner of Alveda Music believes that AI-produced music often sounds overly compressed and lacks the warmth of a carefully produced track. In his view, even a beginner working with software such as FL Studio can sometimes achieve a more convincing result through hands-on production and attention to detail.
This does not mean that artificial intelligence is unable to create enjoyable music. Rather, it suggests that the technology is not yet a complete replacement for the creative and technical decisions made by a producer.
A tool rather than a replacement
The debate surrounding AI has similarities with earlier discussions about samples. When sample-based production became widespread, some people questioned whether music created with pre-recorded sounds could be considered authentic. Today, however, samples are an accepted and essential part of electronic music.
Producers use sample packs, drum libraries, synthesiser presets and sounds included in software instruments. Even artists who do not openly describe their music as sample-based often rely on samples or pre-designed sounds during the production process.
AI may follow a similar path. Instead of replacing musicians entirely, it could become another tool within the studio. Producers may use it to develop ideas, generate demos, explore harmonies or inspire new arrangements. Human involvement would still be essential for editing, sound design, mixing and giving the track a distinctive identity.
The difference between using AI as a creative assistant and releasing an untouched AI-generated track could become increasingly important to labels and audiences.
The appeal of analogue sound
For Alveda Music, musical identity is closely connected to sound. The label’s owner describes himself as a passionate admirer of analogue equipment and the character produced by analogue synthesisers.
He points to classic instruments such as the Roland TR-909 drum machine and the Korg MS-20 synthesiser as examples of equipment capable of creating a powerful electronic sound with a relatively simple setup.
Analogue instruments are often valued for their warmth, saturation and subtle imperfections. Their filters and oscillators can respond in ways that feel less predictable than digital emulations. For some listeners, these imperfections add character and make a production feel more human.
Of course, analogue sound is not automatically better for everyone. Musical taste is subjective, and many producers create excellent records entirely in the digital domain. However, the preference for analogue equipment reflects a wider desire for texture, personality and a recognisable sonic fingerprint.
Is the audience really rejecting AI music?
The claim that listeners are actively avoiding AI-generated music should be treated carefully. There is no single piece of evidence proving that audiences worldwide have rejected AI music altogether. However, concerns about mass-produced content are becoming more visible across the music industry.
Streaming services face the possibility of being flooded with large numbers of automatically generated tracks. This may make it more difficult for listeners to discover independent artists and for labels to maintain quality standards. There are also ongoing debates about copyright, the use of artists’ voices and the data used to train AI systems.
These issues may encourage listeners to look for greater transparency. Audiences could increasingly want to know whether a recording was made by musicians, produced with AI assistance or generated entirely by software.
As a result, authenticity may become a stronger selling point for independent labels and electronic music artists.
Alveda Music continues to expand
While reducing its involvement in fully AI-generated releases, Alveda Music says it is continuing to develop its catalogue and invest in new music. The label has reported significant progress and an increase in activity on Beatport, one of the most important digital platforms for electronic music.
Alveda Music focuses on dance music, including trance, uplifting trance and techno-related styles. Its catalogue features releases from artists such as DJ John Bastian, Nexxus One, Juan Almiñana Obando, Chris Hunt, DJ Ice House, PITTARIUS CODE and Oscar Hawk.
The label says that it is maintaining a consistent release schedule and working systematically on new projects. This strategy reflects the continuing importance of human production, artist development and long-term catalogue building in the electronic music business.
Conclusion
Artificial intelligence is unlikely to disappear from music production. Its ability to generate ideas and accelerate creative workflows means that it will probably remain part of the modern studio. However, fully AI-generated music still faces important challenges, especially in terms of sound quality, emotional impact and artistic identity.
Alveda Music’s decision to stop releasing completely AI-generated tracks highlights a growing distinction between technology-assisted production and music created without meaningful human involvement.
The future may not be a choice between analogue and digital, or between humans and machines. It may instead depend on how producers combine new technology with experience, taste and genuine creative intention. For many listeners, the most important question will remain simple: does the music sound like something made by a person with something to say?
Editorial note: Statements about Alveda Music’s catalogue, Beatport performance and AI-release policy are presented as claims attributed to the label and its owner. Independent performance data was not provided in the source material.
